| Posted on
Living relationships, also known as cohabitation, are legally recognized in India. However, they have become more common in recent years, especially in urban areas.
In terms of societal acceptance, opinions vary among different groups and regions of India. While some people view it as a personal choice and respect the decision of individuals to live together without marriage, others may view it as unacceptable or immoral behavior. Ultimately, societal acceptance of living relationships in India is still evolving and may depend on various factors such as cultural and religious beliefs, age, education, and socio-economic status.
Also read :- what is the mean adultery & is it legal in India?
Source:- google
0
| Posted on
in India normally marriage is a deeply rooted way of acting and the very chief quality of marriage is based on the general rules of medical condition of being able to take some substance without damaging effect and responsiblilities. persons in general from living stages have been coming here after these general rules and have taken into account as it their act to be done to go after these general rules when they get married. But as indian society moved forward and become much more current day persons in general started looking for a that possibly taking place in addition to marriage as marriage according to the new living stage young persons is a weight down and thus wanted something under which they can be living like a married grouped in 2 without any undertakings to do, under these conditions the idea of the live in relation seemed to be the one who keeps others from destruction, trouble. however, the idea of the live in relation had different side effects such as; whether these relations are lawful or whether pre marital sex should be in India , especially when marriage was an organization to the sex caused relations. The most important question under discussion that arose was that what would come about to boys and girls born out of these relations. one thing to be noted is that the experience of live in relations is widely done expertly in buildings covered India especially in of a chief town great towns. The society is separated in connection with whether be living in a relation should be done expertly or not. On one hand, there are persons in general who have in mind that marriage is a church form event and thus is necessary for sex caused relation between a man and women, they put forward that be living in relation put an end to the grouping cloth of the society and thus it would make come into existence orderless mind and for this reason should not be gave respect to. The other side supports this idea and Advocates 2 that we be living in 21stcentury and for this reason boys and girls should be given the state of being free to select their persons working with others and thus they should come to a decision about whether they are able to exist together enough to move into a having a connection to higher purposes deeply rooted way of acting like marriage. What is be living in relation and its agreement with law
Live in relation is a relation which does not make come into existence any rights and responsiblilities that a through being without error well based marriage makes come into existence. Neither the man is joined to support the women nor the women have any kind of responsibility in the direction of the man. It can be formed as a walk in and relation. Both the beings with each other's agreement be living together not because they are married but because they need to be living together. The greatly sized question comes about is this kind of relation gave respect to. The answer is yes although live in relation is not gave respect to in any Statute or any other government (making) laws. But the Supreme court of India through different opinion has given be living in relation a lawful backing.
For the first time, the question of whether live in relation is a lawful relation came to the highest Court 4 in the example of Badri V 5 Dy Director of thing made from others. In the present example the groups of persons were living in a be living in relation for almost 50 years and the question before the Court was whether their relation be given agreement the same position which is given to a married grouped in 2 and the top part Court 4's decision was in way of the grouped in 2 and the top part Court given agreement lawful position to their 50 year relation. In the example ofIndra Sarma V VKV Sarma the Supreme Court held that if at any point any male who is not married is living with a women who is also not married and they also shared the same house then that will come under part 2(f) of kept by man violent acts Act and if at any point of time kept by man violent acts takes place then the wounded in feelings person can make attempts rest under the book division IV of the kept by man violent acts Act.
0